Skip to main content

Bar Standards Board ‘Failing’ Disabled Students

Graduation photo in cap and gown sat in wheelchair




Students sitting this year’s bar exams are alleging they are being discriminated against as reasonable adjustments and basic rights are not being met. 

Due to the Covid pandemic, the exams for aspiring barristers, which were due to be sat in April, are now due to be held throughout August. This leaves many with concerns who are due to start pupillage in September.

Many students are sitting their exams at home via ‘remote proctoring’.  This means sitting in front of a computer for three hours, sometimes more, at a time without moving. Moving away from the situated camera would render the exam a failure.  Students who have already sat their at home exams are already complaining that they had an hours wait before the exam commenced.

For those who would be unable to sit their exam at home for various reasons, they will need to sit their exams at a test centre or defer until December. This means some students would be unable to commence pupillages or employment as planned. Visas have also started to expire meaning students are unable to sit the exam in the UK.  

The Bar Standards Board released exam slots for those without reasonable adjustments first. This left those with additional requirements fighting for their spots as their local test centre was fully booked and they would have to travel miles away for exams that started as early as 8am in the morning. For individuals with disabilities this is an added stress and tiring in itself before the exams even start. For many this meant an overnight stay with an additional cost.

Further, students with reasonable adjustments were unable to book using the online booking system which is free. Instead they were directed to the Parsons Vue telephone booking line. A number of students allege this is a premium number and cost some in the region of £200. Also many students were then on hold for hours waiting to be served only to be hung up on.  

Many students who were finally able to get through to someone were told that their reasonable adjustments could not be accommodated. This was despite on the 3rd July the BSB explicitly stating that “no student should be asked to waive a reasonable adjustment” 蜉 

Some did not have options at all and were told they would be contacted. With exams due to start some are still waiting. 

However on the Bar Standards Board website they have advised any student who is still waiting for an exam date should email Parson Vue directly. 

Students are now receiving emails to say their exams have been cancelled with no reason or replacement option given. Some students did not receive emails but instead found out via social media from other students. 

Further, it transpires that students are being denied their fundamental right to water during their exams. Unless adjustments have been put in place to take fluids into the exam centre with them, students must leave all drinks outside. 

With some areas of the country due to hit 37 degrees tomorrow, some students will have to choose between hydration and their future. It has been scientifically proven蜉 that dehydration can lead to confusion, but students are worried that drinking water will lead to them needing to use the bathroom. Something else that is also not allowed. Parsons Vue and the Bar Standards Board are yet to comment on the situation.

For some time now, the BSB have been trying to make the bar a more diverse and accessible organisation. An investigation into the failing of the exams is being called for by the Association of Disabled lawyers ‘and the impact of students. It should publish a public report on its findings’.蜉 

The Students against the BSB Exam Regulations (SABER) have also issued urgent action from the BSB to “remedy the adverse and discriminatory effects of the August exam regulations”蜉

According to the BSB蜉 Diversity at the Bar published in January this year individuals with disabilities are hugely unrepresented at the Bar with just 6 per cent of Barristers who responded to the survey disclosing they have a disability. This is less than half of the national average.  

The Bar Standards Board, who has a statutory obligation under the Equality Act 2010 has previously released a statement advising it is committed to delivering diversity and equality and fairness must be a standard principle within their establishment.

The Bar Standards Board have not yet advised whether or not they will be opening an investigation into this year bar exams. If they did look implementing some if not all of the recommendations from the Association of Disabled Lawyers, The Young Legal Aid Lawyers and SABER, then the BSB may start to re-gain students confidence. 


Written By: Victoria-Jayne Scholes





 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

World Diabetes Day - From Nurse to Superhero

  Every year on the 14 th November the world turns blue in support of the millions of diabetics worldwide. This year is no different. Right now millions of superheroes get ready to don their capes from carers, to parents, to diabetic teams to friends and family and most importantly diabetics themselves. This year the theme is the ‘Nurse and Diabetes’ which celebrates the truly wonderful work millions of nurses do in support of individuals with diabetes, but I ask you this ‘What defines the definition of a nurse?’. I ask you to look at the cover photo of this story and study it for a few moments. As you do ask yourself these questions, what do these ladies have in common? Is one more qualified than the others? Ready to move on…   T o answer your question what these ladies all have in common is they all care for someone with Type One diabetes. First the Support worker who for the last two years has cared for me, a type 1 diabetic of 27 years. Every visit she reminds me to check

Why Are Disabled Individuals Still Being Discriminated against in the Legal Profession?

Legally Powered at the Supreme Court When choosing a career in law I didn’t even think about my disability being an issue. However, it was something my close family and friends often questioned. I would quickly silence them with ‘it’s the legal profession, there is not going to be a problem’. How I was wrong! I started my journey by trying to decide if I wanted to be a barrister or solicitor, so I started my research into different firms and chambers and armed with my top choices for chambers, off I went to a pupillage fair. My first stop was my top choice which here will remain nameless. There I was sat in my chair. The gentleman seemed kind enough, humoured me with the ins and outs of the workings of the chamber, drew me in. This was it! I liked this chamber! I liked this man! I think they are my top choice to apply to! Then came the killer: “the only issue we have is we are a listed building so have no access as we are on the first floor, so with you being in a wheelchair I don’t